Christian Ministry and Family Advocacy

Christian Alliance for Indian Child Welfare

  • Home
  • Christian Ministry
    • Prayer Warriors
    • Mission Trips
    • Scriptural Heart
  • Family Advocacy
    • CASE LAW
      • Meyer v. State of Nebraska (USSC 1923)
      • Pierce v. Society of Sisters (USSC 1925)
      • Brown v. Board of Education (USSC 1954)
      • Mississippi Choctaw v. Holyfield (USSC 1989)
      • In re Bridget R. (Pomo Twins) (1996)
    • Family Stories
      • Family VIDEOS
      • Book: Dying in Indian Country
    • ICWA
      • The full text of the INDIAN CHILD WELFARE ACT OF 1978
      • Legislative History
    • Legal Assistance
  • BLOG
  • MeWe
  • CAICW Legal Fund
  • CAICW General Fund
  • Who We Are
    • In Memoriam – Roland J. Morris Sr.
    • ‘Dying in Indian Country’
  • BOOK: Roland’s Story
Fraud & Abuse » violence » Child Abuse » A Rebuttal:
  Court Rules in Adoptive Couple vs. Baby Girl; Clears Way to Finalize Adoption   BABY VERONICA UPDATE; The Battle Continues.

A Rebuttal:

Jul 242013
 

In a July 12th commentary in North Dakota papers, attorneys Tobias Rushing and Robert Moddelmog criticizedJoseRodrigues2005 former ND Lt. Governor Lloyd Omdahl for his July 1st column concerning the Indian Child Welfare Act.

Mr. Omdahl had stated that ICWA is “sacrificing children to protect the heritage of the tribes.”  Rushing and Moddelmog noted that “the findings of Congress’s Indian Child Welfare Act Commission of 1973 show…the contrary.”   I am certain it is not lost on readers that these findings are 40 years old.  Now let’s discuss today.

I’m appalled that attorneys would make the absolute statement “An abusive Indian family does not take precedence over a safe non-Indian family, ever.” A three-year-old girl was thrown down an embankment and beaten to death in Spirit Lake just last month. Clearly, abusive extended family DID take precedence over a safe non-Indian family. Other examples:

  1. A Detective in Bonney Lake, WA, was forced by ICWA social workers to leave a toddler he’d been raising at the home of a suspected drug dealer.
  2. Because social workers believed ICWA demanded it, the Rodriguez boys of California were taken from the home of their Hispanic grandparents and placed with their maternal grandmother on the Ute Reservation – a woman who had abused and lost custody of her own children. Within three weeks, the oldest boy was permanently brain damaged from beatings.
  3. Sierra McGaughey joined us in DC, February, 2013, to tell Congressional staff that she was torn from a safe home off the reservation and placed in a dangerous relatives’ home, where she was given to a man as a sexual partner at the age of 10. She begged to return to where she felt loved, but wasn’t allowed until she tried to hang herself at age 16.

There are many stories from across the country.

Thomas Sullivan, Regional Administrator of the Administration of Children and Families in Denver, stated in his 12th Mandated Report to the ACF office in DC, February 2013:

“In these 8 months I have filed detailed reports concerning all of the following:

  1. The almost 40 children returned to on-reservation placements in abusive homes, many headed by known sex offenders… These children remain in the full time care and custody of sexual predators available to be raped on a daily basis. Since I filed my first report noting this situation, nothing has been done by any of you to remove these children to safe placements.
  2. The 45 children who were placed, at the direction of Tribal Social Services (TSS), BIA social workers, BIA supervised TSS social workers and the BIA funded Tribal Court, in homes where parents were addicted to drugs and/or where they had been credibly accused of abuse or neglect…

“…Those adults remain protected by the law enforcement which by its inaction is encouraging the predators to keep on hunting for and raping children at Spirit Lake.

 

Rushing and Moddelmog also state, “studies showed that American Indian children who have been removed from their ethnic and cultural heritage often suffer a host of psychological and identity issues, not counting the damage caused by the initial removal.”

Yet, without any concern for psychological effect, ICWA is frequently used to remove children from non-Indian homes that better reflect their ethnic and cultural heritage than a home on the reservation. Tribal apologists claim that children of even minute heritage who’ve never lived anywhere near a reservation or with a tribal member are going to suffer identity issues, as if there is an inherent gene that makes these children different from any other. In some circles, that is referred to as “racism.”

Rushing and Moddelmog include a quote from Judge William Thorne that “more than 60 percent of American Indian children in non-native foster care who age out of the system “are homeless, in prison, or dead by age 20.”  Where are comparison percentages for children raised in native foster care?  Further, these children were fostered due to abuse, neglect, or abandonment. Many suffer with fetal alcohol related issues. How can the sole reason for struggle be due to non-native homes?

Finally, while an American Indian grandmother who adopts a child qualifies for the benefits of any adoptive parent, most children are not “adopted” by extended Indian family. In Minnesota, those caring for unadopted relatives receive “Relative Custody Assistance,” which can be over $700 per child per month. I am speaking from personal experience having been an ICWA approved home.

Yup, I “raked in” thousands of dollars in state benefits as an ICWA home. Over 16 years, it added up to almost $90,000, not including medical care the kids received from the state. And I am first to say these children would’ve been better off had a therapeutic foster home trained to take care of special needs been allowed – no matter the heritage of the foster parents.

It is time for balder-dash to end and genuine concern begin.

Quoting Mr. Omdahl, “It is time to take another look at the federal foster care and adoption policy that keeps Indian children in homes that threaten their well-being while safe homes are automatically ruled out.”

 

Elizabeth Sharon Morris is Chairwoman of the Christian Alliance for Indian Child Welfare and author of ‘Dying in Indian Country.’ http://dyinginindiancountry.com/

 

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

  Court Rules in Adoptive Couple vs. Baby Girl; Clears Way to Finalize Adoption   BABY VERONICA UPDATE; The Battle Continues.
guidestar
  • CAICW Newsletter, January 2021

    CAICW Newsletter, January 2021

  • 5 and a half classic movies that keep ‘Christ’ in ‘Christmas’

    5 and a half classic movies that keep ‘Christ’ in ‘Christmas’

  • Letter to Federal Agency re: Missing and Murdered Native Americans

    Letter to Federal Agency re: Missing and Murdered Native Americans

  • Lloyd Omdahl: No demonstrations for Native Americans

    Lloyd Omdahl: No demonstrations for Native Americans

  • To our Members and Followers

    To our Members and Followers

  • Senator Hoeven and Senate Committee push “historic levels of funding for Indian country in Phase III Coronavirus response”

    Senator Hoeven and Senate Committee push “historic levels of funding for Indian country in Phase III Coronavirus response”

  • We will NOT be Intimidated - Send your Testimony for the Commission on Native Children

    We will NOT be Intimidated – Send your Testimony for the Commission on Native Children

  • Tell Congress How to Best Meet the Needs of Native Children

    Tell Congress How to Best Meet the Needs of Native Children

  • The Philosophical Underpinnings and Negative Consequences of the Indian Child Welfare Act

    The Philosophical Underpinnings and Negative Consequences of the Indian Child Welfare Act

  • Read CAICW's Amicus in the Brackeen ICWA case

    Read CAICW’s Amicus in the Brackeen ICWA case

  • Appointed to Congressional Commission on Native Children

    Appointed to Congressional Commission on Native Children

  • CAICW - Advocacy and Ministry

    CAICW – Advocacy and Ministry

  • Declared "Sanctuary" for Children Running from ICWA -

    Declared “Sanctuary” for Children Running from ICWA –

  • FIVE THINGS you can do to help fight ICWA.

    FIVE THINGS you can do to help fight ICWA.

  • Our Pledge to Defend Children

    Our Pledge to Defend Children

  • TOM SULLIVAN - FIRED for reporting Child Abuse

    TOM SULLIVAN – FIRED for reporting Child Abuse

  • Letter to Every Senator - PROTECT OUR CHILDREN

    Letter to Every Senator – PROTECT OUR CHILDREN

  • ICWA stole her from the mother she loved -

    ICWA stole her from the mother she loved –

  • They said he was an "Anti-Indian" Native American -

    They said he was an “Anti-Indian” Native American –

  • Attorney General Eric Holder's Dec 3, 2014 remarks in Full

    Attorney General Eric Holder’s Dec 3, 2014 remarks in Full

« Previous Pause Next »

Recent Posts

  • CAICW Newsletter, January 2021
  • 5 and a half classic movies that keep ‘Christ’ in ‘Christmas’
  • Letter to Federal Agency re: Missing and Murdered Native Americans
  • Lloyd Omdahl: No demonstrations for Native Americans
  • To our Members and Followers

Donate through Paypal

Organization Information

CHRISTIAN ALLIANCE FOR INDIAN CHILD WELFARE
PO BOX 460
HILLSBORO, ND 58045

EMAIL
administrator@caicw.org

MISSION
CAICW is committed to seek God’s guidance in defending the rights of the poor and needy, as instructed in Proverbs 31:8-9.

501c3 non-profit

Privacy Policy

Terms and Conditions

REPORTS Guidestar

© 2004-2020 Christian Alliance for Indian Child Welfare (CAICW) Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha